![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)

An excerpt from the article:
Though raising an infant has been challenging, Bristol has the unconditional love and support of her family — especially her mother, Sarah Palin. After all, no one can better understand the complicated decision to have a baby under difficult circumstances. Just a year earlier, at the age of 44, Sarah carried her son Trig to term, even though she was told during a sonogram that he would be born with Down syndrome. Now, the mother and daughter are sharing a unique experience— raising baby boys together under the same roof.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-15 04:13 am (UTC)While I'm glad Sarah Palin did continue her pregnancy, it really irritates me that the article phrases it as if it was some majorly unusual choice to make. As if the obvious and 'normal' thing to do would be to abort Trig because he wasn't 'perfect'.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-15 04:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-15 04:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-15 04:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-15 06:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-15 09:58 am (UTC)