(no subject)
Nov. 6th, 2009 01:16 pm![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
This is really ridiculous.
If you live in Arizona, you know that photo-radar for speed enforcement is part of daily life. You also know that those "tickets" you get in the mail with your mug and your license plate demanding that you fork over $200 or more aren't "real" tickets because they haven't been served to you. So, most of us ignore them until a proxy catches us.
Americans have the right to contest any charges made against them in a court of law, and this includes photo radar tickets. Arizonans don't waive that right and now they are fined for exercising it. The courts are now charging people who wish to contest their photo-radar ticket before a judge $20 additional dollars on top of the original ticket. The justification? 50% of the court's cases are now photo-radar related and they simply cannot afford the cost of seeing everyone. They say the number of photo-radar cases continues to increase and the fee is to pay for the current load as well as the projected increases.
Ironically, the photo-radar systems when installed were touted by the state (then under Janet Napolitano) as being a big revenue-generator. Now we see that they're actually costing the state money and, naturally, the burden falls on the people to foot the bill. You'd think if they can't afford it they'd take the system down (one sheriff did abolish them in his county, and no, it wasn't Sheriff Joe), but nope. They'd rather break our backs over it instead.
How messed up is that?
If you live in Arizona, you know that photo-radar for speed enforcement is part of daily life. You also know that those "tickets" you get in the mail with your mug and your license plate demanding that you fork over $200 or more aren't "real" tickets because they haven't been served to you. So, most of us ignore them until a proxy catches us.
Americans have the right to contest any charges made against them in a court of law, and this includes photo radar tickets. Arizonans don't waive that right and now they are fined for exercising it. The courts are now charging people who wish to contest their photo-radar ticket before a judge $20 additional dollars on top of the original ticket. The justification? 50% of the court's cases are now photo-radar related and they simply cannot afford the cost of seeing everyone. They say the number of photo-radar cases continues to increase and the fee is to pay for the current load as well as the projected increases.
Ironically, the photo-radar systems when installed were touted by the state (then under Janet Napolitano) as being a big revenue-generator. Now we see that they're actually costing the state money and, naturally, the burden falls on the people to foot the bill. You'd think if they can't afford it they'd take the system down (one sheriff did abolish them in his county, and no, it wasn't Sheriff Joe), but nope. They'd rather break our backs over it instead.
How messed up is that?
no subject
Date: 2009-11-06 09:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-06 09:46 pm (UTC)That said, even a .223 could take one of those things out.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-07 01:19 am (UTC)But on a serious note, people here really despise these things. There has been vandalism and all sorts of things (just look it up on YouTube). A man operating a photo radar van was killed when someone fired a shot into what I'm guessing they thought/hoped was an unoccupied vehicle.
This additional fine is just another insult on top of everything else we're dealing with caused directly by the state's incompetence.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-07 11:22 am (UTC)After all, even the most rabid liberal is libertarian when it comes to their own behaviour. Just ask one about abortion.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-07 03:07 am (UTC)YIS,
WRI
no subject
Date: 2009-11-07 11:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-07 03:39 am (UTC)Virginia got into the camera thing a couple of years before I moved away and my mom got busted by one of them.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-07 05:13 am (UTC)Being fair to Arizonans
Date: 2009-11-09 09:41 pm (UTC)No, if Arizon sucks, it's because of it's gorram-awful climate. But I'm a Washingtonian, so what do I know :-)?
Re: Being fair to Arizonans
Date: 2009-11-09 11:38 pm (UTC)As for the political side - I'd suppose all states have their pros and cons - I just had a friend who moved from AZ, and her family still lives there and she would just bring stuff up that'd make me go "well, I'm glad I don't have to live with that." (Of course I suppose there could be things I'm used to here that people elsewhere feel relief they don't have to deal with.)