Ahh, Priceless.
Aug. 23rd, 2009 01:05 pmSo liberals have their knickers in a twist over the fact that the CEO of Whole Foods, John Mackey, doesn't support ObamaCare. They feel they have been misled, that the company is being "hypocritical" and this corrupts the "ethos of caring for the community" that Whole Foods purportedly supports. Here is the editorial he wrote.
Now, not being an American, I have never shopped at Whole Foods (though I do find now that they have a small number of branches in the UK, where I currently live, and Canada, where I normally live). So I'm not entirely certain of the image that the stores put up, but I think the articles give a pretty good idea.
So who says that healthy food that is environmentally sustainable and good treatment of employees is a purely liberal notion? Well, liberals, clearly, but to a libertarian like myself, it is just common sense. You want to make sure food you sell is good for you, so customers are healthy and keep coming back for that, you want it to be sustainable so that you can keep your business in business, and happy employees are good employees. But somehow people think that only liberals do that?
Sigh. I've known that John Mackey was a libertarian for years, even though I'm not American and have never shopped at Whole Foods. But when I get down to London, and then go home to Toronto, I will make sure to stop in there!
EDIT: Oops, missed that there was already a post about this. Just saw the article on BBC myself though. But we can have a conversation about liberal assumptions about everyone believing the same things regarding food and sustainability and such, yes?
Now, not being an American, I have never shopped at Whole Foods (though I do find now that they have a small number of branches in the UK, where I currently live, and Canada, where I normally live). So I'm not entirely certain of the image that the stores put up, but I think the articles give a pretty good idea.
So who says that healthy food that is environmentally sustainable and good treatment of employees is a purely liberal notion? Well, liberals, clearly, but to a libertarian like myself, it is just common sense. You want to make sure food you sell is good for you, so customers are healthy and keep coming back for that, you want it to be sustainable so that you can keep your business in business, and happy employees are good employees. But somehow people think that only liberals do that?
Sigh. I've known that John Mackey was a libertarian for years, even though I'm not American and have never shopped at Whole Foods. But when I get down to London, and then go home to Toronto, I will make sure to stop in there!
EDIT: Oops, missed that there was already a post about this. Just saw the article on BBC myself though. But we can have a conversation about liberal assumptions about everyone believing the same things regarding food and sustainability and such, yes?
no subject
Date: 2009-08-23 12:26 pm (UTC)Professions that are liberal? Teachers. My crazy ex roommate was a teaching major and thought that she "had" to be a liberal despite having all conservative political beliefs (if she cared about anything political at all).
More assumptions. Yesterday I saw that there were liberal individuals all butt-hurt about the Foundation for a Better Life because the sole contributor happens to be a conservative and Christian. Because of such, apparently the messages that the commercials promote, such as encouragement, are deemed as hypocritical. However, it's obvious just WHAT is hypocritical about the kind of attitude being displayed by the would-be supporters.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-23 12:47 pm (UTC)There are no Whole Foods in my area. We have Wegmans, which is also known for holding to a higher standard of quality in its produce--and being non-union in UBER pro-union New York State. Consumer reports just scored them as number 1 in the country as having the best value and selection. *gasp* And without the aid of the Unions!
no subject
Date: 2009-08-23 01:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-23 01:28 pm (UTC)Every state has different requirements for licensing. New York State has one of the highest, requiring 1000 hours as well as passage of the state board exam. Jim went to New York Institute of Massage, which just happens to be located in my area and is one of the best schools in the State. The study course consisted of 4-12 week semesters and only took 1 year to complete.
For Texas, Jim had to also pass the National Licensing Exam, which is recognized in several states. (He said it was a breeze compared to the state exam!) He absolutely LOVES this job! He has been volunteering his time at the local Senior Center, giving free chair massages twice a month.
Yeah, I'm a proud mom.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-23 01:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-23 01:52 pm (UTC)Anyway, thanks for the info!
no subject
Date: 2009-08-23 02:44 pm (UTC)If you have a Massage Therapy school in your area, they probably have a clinic. You can get a massage at a reduced price, and the students get experience.
With all sorting, packing, lifting we're doing, Jim keeps saying he needs a massage. (The one draw back of his profession is he can't give himself a massage!) So he's going to the clinic this week.
Not surprisingly, since Massage Therapists fall under the aegis of healthcare workers, they are not fans of Obamacare, either. They don't want some government bureaucrat telling them who they can and cannot have as a client.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-23 04:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-23 01:57 pm (UTC)Is he single? ;D I've been starting to worry that "long-haired man" and "right of center" were mutually exclusive terms. I love long hair on men, and I've only ever met one long-haired man who wasn't a die-hard liberal.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-23 02:35 pm (UTC)Heh. As a matter of fact. . .
Jim, my (25 year old) baby elephant Massage Therapist.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-23 02:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-23 04:12 pm (UTC)People always assume that, because of his size and build, he's into sports. The only sport he was ever into was Martial Arts. Ironically, he isn't into any of the typical "guy" stuff. I know more about cars and home repairs than he does. In fact, I just finished fixing the brackets in his closet.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-23 09:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-23 03:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-23 04:19 pm (UTC)Furries are a unique breed. They have to fight multiple stereotypes, which seems to be one of the reasons they band together.
Jim went to his first Furry Con in July and had a blast. It was the first time he'd been around several hundred fellow furries.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-24 06:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-23 02:03 pm (UTC)The one shred of sanity in the liberal-dominated backpacker scene that I've found is one of my Australian co-workers, who claims she doesn't really care about politics, but voted Liberal in the last Aussie elections (the Liberals in Australia are the conservative party, while Labor are the left-wing party), because she "liked the way the country was and didn't want it to change" (the Liberals had been in power for the last eleven years) and thought that the Labor candidate's campaign promises (such as giving all Year 12 students a laptop) would waste tax dollars. Sounds pretty conservative to me :)
no subject
Date: 2009-08-23 02:09 pm (UTC)You have just stated a very good example of why I hate the terms "liberal" and "conservative"!
no subject
Date: 2009-08-23 02:16 pm (UTC)Then there's degrees of left-wing vs. right-wing. For example, Canada's Conservatives are right-wing - in Canada. In the US, they'd still probably be considered further left than pre-Obama Democrats. Australia's Liberals are probably also to the left of US Democrats, but right-wing for Australia.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-26 04:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-23 01:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-23 01:48 pm (UTC)This has confused me for years!
(I have never shopped at WF, but only because they didn't have them in my area. They do where I am now, but I've been unemployed for what seems like forever, so I never got a chance to try it.)
Anyway, I don't get it either. I don't know whether WF meets its lofty goals, but I would love to shop at a store that offers healthy alternatives and cares about the environment. (In a SANE way, not some of the extreme things that go on in the name of environmentalism.)
***
The sad part is that if the store loses significant business, this guy will never speak out about anything again. And neither will any other business owners. Which means whatever insanity Obama tries next, business owners will feel they have no choice but to support it.
That angers me most of all.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-23 03:51 pm (UTC)Um, story of my life. I care about what I eat and like to cook with stuff that doesn't have strings of numbers in the ingredients, so therefore I must be super left-wing.
(Although it can be fun... the last food co op I went to in the US there was a guy walking around greeting the employees carrying a 'PEACE' sign. I was with my fiance and we're a military couple, so I was daring him to ask for a military discount at the cashier. He wouldn't do it, though :) )
no subject
Date: 2009-08-23 05:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-23 09:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-23 09:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-23 10:37 pm (UTC)Sorry, I've been holding that in for a while. -_-;
no subject
Date: 2009-08-23 10:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-24 09:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-24 02:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-24 02:34 pm (UTC)This is why I'm a libertarian. Minimal government, not one that can be bought by other unions or CEOs, and one that lets people control their own lives and businesses without a mountain of paperwork.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-24 06:07 pm (UTC)Huh. Didn't know there was a Dconner on this comm!
no subject
Date: 2009-08-25 03:34 am (UTC)