Input appreciated
Dec. 7th, 2003 02:18 amHello, everyone,
I hope this isn't too off topic, since it doesn't contain anything 'fannish'. If it is, please let me know and I will delete it.
For my history class, I am required to write a paper on the topic given by my professor: Who is America's most successful President from 1974-2000? I have been thinking about it and think I am going to go with Reagan(big surprise, no?). I would greatly appreciate what others thing about the question, especially if your answer is also Reagan. What do you deem his greatest successes? Could you perhaps recommend some nice websites I could use?
Any and all help and opinions are greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance! :) I love this community so much. It's great I know I'm not alone in my politics...a feeling I often get at college.
(apologies for cross-posting)
I hope this isn't too off topic, since it doesn't contain anything 'fannish'. If it is, please let me know and I will delete it.
For my history class, I am required to write a paper on the topic given by my professor: Who is America's most successful President from 1974-2000? I have been thinking about it and think I am going to go with Reagan(big surprise, no?). I would greatly appreciate what others thing about the question, especially if your answer is also Reagan. What do you deem his greatest successes? Could you perhaps recommend some nice websites I could use?
Any and all help and opinions are greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance! :) I love this community so much. It's great I know I'm not alone in my politics...a feeling I often get at college.
(apologies for cross-posting)
no subject
Date: 2003-12-07 09:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-12-07 09:28 am (UTC)That would be my choice too. I say this not because of stuff I actually remember from that era (I was just a kid), but from things I've read since. Ann Coulter has a good chapter or two on how he pretty much led Soviet Communism to its demise, in her book Treason (and how everyone pretends he had nothing to do with it).
Of course, if it's for a college class you may also have to explain why Soviet Communism was actually a bad thing. ;)
no subject
Date: 2003-12-07 10:00 pm (UTC)LOL! So very true!
I've been meaning to put Ann's book on my Christmas list. And read it in front of my liberal roomate who hates her. Read it a lot. And quote it. A lot. :)
no subject
Date: 2003-12-08 05:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-12-07 11:05 am (UTC)Insiders dubbed this plan “The Reagan Doctrine”. Reagan based his plan on the supposition that direct military, economic and political pressure against communist governments would strain the Soviet Union’s military and economic system to a point where they could not compete. He felt that the Sovietization of the third world had to be reversed as well. The so-called “Reagan Doctrine” threw economic and political support for insurrectionary movements in third world countries where Marxist-Leninist communism had been launched. The major difference between this doctrine and earlier ones (such as the Truman, Eisenhower, and Carter doctrines) was the fact that Reagan emphasized a “cure” while the others sought “prevention”.
His domestic achievements are a little more of a mixed bag – for example, he pushed for a tax cut but then he signed one of the largest tax increases in recent history. Also, during his first term, the president sought to shift dozens of federal programs to the state and local levels under his system of "new federalism." Officials in these jurisdictions complained that promised federal aid to implement the programs was inadequate. However, despite such things, Reagan displayed an air of pride and confidence and after 2 decades of decline, there was an explosive increase in citizen trust in the government.
The following websites are great sources: Reagan and the Soviets (http://www.reagan.dk/newintro.htm)
The Reagan Era Report (http://home.att.net/~mwhodges/1980-88.htm)
Reagan Belongs on Kings Row (http://www.opinionjournal.com/hail/under.html?id=65000721)
Hope this helps...
-K.
no subject
Date: 2003-12-08 08:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-12-08 08:47 am (UTC)Everyone blasts Bush for 'ruining' the economic golden years provided by Clinton. No one recalls that the economy was booming during Regan's reign... The Nasdaq is now at 9000+, where it was during the Regan years, but it's being trashed as a weak economy. Puh-lease...
From a GenXer who was a Reagan Teen
Date: 2003-12-20 02:23 pm (UTC)I cant think of any good books right off hand that would be good for Reagan research off the top of my head, but Rush Limbaugh's first book would be a good start. Don't let yourself get sidetracked by all the little niggly arguments. The fact was Reagan was a DIFFERENT kind of politician, one that neither the Democrats OR Republicans had seen before, and it meant SO MUCH to the rest of us Americans.
Plus he was DAMN funny....even when he had been shot.
Sharon Ferguson
http://www.brazoscantina.com
Re: From a GenXer who was a Reagan Teen
Date: 2003-12-21 09:24 pm (UTC)I kind of wish I were old enough to remember Reagan as President. :) I've read some quotes of his and he was very funny. The more I read about him the more I love him.
Thanks again!