![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
I understand the current gas prices are out of control - but how about REPEALING some of the taxes on fuel/gasoline instead of saying "You've made too much money"?
Oil prices are globablly higher - not just US companies...
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,364846,00.html
WASHINGTON — With gasoline prices topping $4 a gallon, Senate Democrats want the government to grab some of the billions of dollars in profits being taken in by the major oil companies.
Senators were to vote Tuesday on whether to consider a windfall profits tax against the five largest U.S. oil companies and rescind $17 billion in tax breaks the companies expect to enjoy over the next decade.
"The oil companies need to know that there is a limit on how much profit they can take in this economy," said Sen. Richard Durbin of Illinois, the Senate's No. 2 Democrat, warning that if energy prices are not reined in "we're going to find ourselves in a deep recession."
But the Democrats are going to have to overcome staunch Republican opposition to any new taxes on the oil industry. The five largest U.S. oil companies earned $36 billion during the first three months of the year.
Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., will need 60 votes Tuesday to proceed with the oil tax legislation in the face of a threatened GOP filibuster. If he doesn't get 60, he likely will pull the bill from the floor.
Only last week, Reid was forced to withdraw a measure aimed at addressing global warming, falling short of the 60 votes needed to advance that legislation.
The Democrats' energy package also would:
— Make oil and gas price gouging a federal crime, with stiff penalties of up to $5 million during a presidentially declared energy emergency.
— Authorize the Justice Department to bring charges of price fixing against countries that belong to the OPEC oil cartel.
— Require traders to put up more collateral in the energy futures markets to curb speculation.
Republican leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky has acknowledged that Americans are hurting from the high energy costs but strongly opposes the Democrats' response and has ridiculed those who "think we can tax our way out of this problem."
Oil executives, testifying before Congress last month, called the proposed taxes "punitive" and warned that they would discourage domestic oil and gas exploration and production, possibly causing prices to rise instead of fall.
The American Petroleum Institute, which represents the major oil companies, has been reminding lawmakers that in the early 1980s, when the government imposed windfall profits taxes on oil companies domestic oil production dropped and imports increased.
But Democrats reject the comparison.
The Senate proposal would impose a 25 percent tax on profits over what would be determined "reasonable" and would allow oil companies to avoid paying the tax if they invest the money in alternative energy projects or refinery expansion.
The tax breaks that would be rescinded, given by Congress over the past five years, are expected to save the five largest oil companies about $17 billion over the next 10 years. The Democratic proposal would funnel the money into tax incentives for renewable energy sources such as wind and solar, and to promote energy efficiency and conservation.
Most Senate Republicans have a different approach to dealing with the growing energy crisis — pump more oil and gas.
The GOP energy plan, rejected by the Senate last month, calls for opening a coastal strip of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska to oil development and to allow states to opt out of the national moratorium that has been in effect for a quarter century against oil and gas drilling in more than 80 percent of the country's coastal waters.
"Republicans by and large believe that the solution to this problem, in part, is to increase domestic production," said McConnell.
Oil prices are globablly higher - not just US companies...
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,364846,00.html
WASHINGTON — With gasoline prices topping $4 a gallon, Senate Democrats want the government to grab some of the billions of dollars in profits being taken in by the major oil companies.
Senators were to vote Tuesday on whether to consider a windfall profits tax against the five largest U.S. oil companies and rescind $17 billion in tax breaks the companies expect to enjoy over the next decade.
"The oil companies need to know that there is a limit on how much profit they can take in this economy," said Sen. Richard Durbin of Illinois, the Senate's No. 2 Democrat, warning that if energy prices are not reined in "we're going to find ourselves in a deep recession."
But the Democrats are going to have to overcome staunch Republican opposition to any new taxes on the oil industry. The five largest U.S. oil companies earned $36 billion during the first three months of the year.
Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., will need 60 votes Tuesday to proceed with the oil tax legislation in the face of a threatened GOP filibuster. If he doesn't get 60, he likely will pull the bill from the floor.
Only last week, Reid was forced to withdraw a measure aimed at addressing global warming, falling short of the 60 votes needed to advance that legislation.
The Democrats' energy package also would:
— Make oil and gas price gouging a federal crime, with stiff penalties of up to $5 million during a presidentially declared energy emergency.
— Authorize the Justice Department to bring charges of price fixing against countries that belong to the OPEC oil cartel.
— Require traders to put up more collateral in the energy futures markets to curb speculation.
Republican leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky has acknowledged that Americans are hurting from the high energy costs but strongly opposes the Democrats' response and has ridiculed those who "think we can tax our way out of this problem."
Oil executives, testifying before Congress last month, called the proposed taxes "punitive" and warned that they would discourage domestic oil and gas exploration and production, possibly causing prices to rise instead of fall.
The American Petroleum Institute, which represents the major oil companies, has been reminding lawmakers that in the early 1980s, when the government imposed windfall profits taxes on oil companies domestic oil production dropped and imports increased.
But Democrats reject the comparison.
The Senate proposal would impose a 25 percent tax on profits over what would be determined "reasonable" and would allow oil companies to avoid paying the tax if they invest the money in alternative energy projects or refinery expansion.
The tax breaks that would be rescinded, given by Congress over the past five years, are expected to save the five largest oil companies about $17 billion over the next 10 years. The Democratic proposal would funnel the money into tax incentives for renewable energy sources such as wind and solar, and to promote energy efficiency and conservation.
Most Senate Republicans have a different approach to dealing with the growing energy crisis — pump more oil and gas.
The GOP energy plan, rejected by the Senate last month, calls for opening a coastal strip of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska to oil development and to allow states to opt out of the national moratorium that has been in effect for a quarter century against oil and gas drilling in more than 80 percent of the country's coastal waters.
"Republicans by and large believe that the solution to this problem, in part, is to increase domestic production," said McConnell.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-10 02:13 pm (UTC)What we really need is for everyone who is upset about gas prices and who lives in a state or congressional district to start calling their Senators and congressmen and demand they vote to open ANWR to drilling and allow drilling offshore elsewhere. Congress will respond is enough people contact them and show just how mad they are.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-10 05:18 pm (UTC)And I totally agree! I couldn't believe this story. Incredible that these people THINK this.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-10 05:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-10 05:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-10 02:30 pm (UTC)I haven't decided whether to send a letter or call. I don't think they'd actually read the letter but "Could you guys be bigger idiots?" looks good in print to me.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-10 05:19 pm (UTC)Like the way your brain works! LOL!
no subject
Date: 2008-06-10 06:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-11 01:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-11 02:00 am (UTC):) Friending you back!
no subject
Date: 2008-06-10 05:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-10 02:47 pm (UTC)Oh, and this determining "reasonable" business. Whose job will that be? I know many liberals consider any profit at all to be immoral.
Ah, the sweet stench of socialism.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-10 05:25 pm (UTC)My biggest peeve - REASONABLE PROFIT! I know profiteering/price gouging. I UNDERSTAND that - but in this case, the GOVERNMENT should be looking at THEIR price gouging! Taxes are higher than what the companies are bringing in per each tank of gas...right?
*grumble*
no subject
Date: 2008-06-10 03:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-10 05:26 pm (UTC)Love it if the media would pick up THAT story...
And congrats on Baby! Wish you the best there! :)
no subject
Date: 2008-06-10 04:48 pm (UTC)However. When this board member gave us a tour of his fantastic home, one of my coworkers (who has worked in non-profits her whole career) turned to me and was like, "Can you believe how much money he has? If people like him would just get off their asses, they could fix our economy!" Yes, clearly he is a selfish bastard and those millions of dollars we spend each year on free medical care for poor children just *appears* in our coffers.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-10 05:30 pm (UTC)Makes no sense why people require that of others and on many levels, not themselves. If your co-worker worked really hard and made lots of $$ - bet you even money he/she would want to KEEP it.
*shakes head*
no subject
Date: 2008-06-10 04:51 pm (UTC)I would think any American who knows anything about how for-profit companies work would realize that the windfall tax will only affect the consumer and will do absolutely nothing but discourage businesses from operating here. In fact, should this tax come to pass, I envision companies vacating the United States entirely and moving overseas, resulting in an employment and economic disaster. Who will the Democrats blame, then? More importantly, what will happen to everyday Americans who would lose their jobs over it?
Lastly, this is exactly what Obama means when he says that we shouldn't be able to set our thermostats at the temperature we want or drive the cars we want, etc. He'll tax us and pass laws to control our private behaviors and people will bow and kiss his feet for he is the Messiah and ambrosia spilleth from his lips. This has got to stop.
Edit:
And do you know what's really ironic about all of this? While our Congress twiddles its thumbs and attacks the oil companies, China and Cuba set up oil platforms 50 miles off the Florida coastline and angle-drill into our shelf and our reserves. And then, once they've got our oil, they'll sell it back to us, laughing all the way to the bank.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-10 05:32 pm (UTC)Seriously - agree on all of the above! This is absolutely crazy and Obama will bring prices up much higher than they are now - on EVERYTHING!
no subject
Date: 2008-06-10 05:10 pm (UTC)The oil companies will pass the tax along to the consumer. In reference, see basic Economics 101.
Thanks for being morons,
A voter.
"Republicans by and large believe that the solution to this problem, in part, is to increase domestic production," said McConnell.
Agreed. Basic supply and demand. My father and I talked about this a few days ago. I said we needed to release the reserves. His argument was that we don't have enough reserves. I told him I didn't care. When OPEC sees we won't be buying as much because we're cutting in our reserves, they'll lower prices because the demand will fall.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-10 05:33 pm (UTC)