Celebs Against Terrorism -- In Print!
Aug. 17th, 2006 10:18 pm![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
I love it when articles appear that are pretty much tailor-made for this comm :D
Some familiar names there, along with a few new ones, I think.
If anyone can get a copy of that ad, or finds it linked on a blog or something, definitely drop a line so we can get a better idea of who signed their name to this!
Thanks,
sameinanylingo, for pointing us towards this blog post that has the ad. :D
NICOLE Kidman has made a public stand against terrorism.
The actress, joined by 84 other high-profile Hollywood stars, directors, studio bosses and media moguls, has taken out a powerfully-worded full page advertisement in today's Los Angeles Times newspaper.
It specifically targets "terrorist organisations" such as Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in Palestine.
"We the undersigned are pained and devastated by the civilian casualties in Israel and Lebanon caused by terrorist actions initiated by terrorist organisations such as Hezbollah and Hamas," the ad reads.
"If we do not succeed in stopping terrorism around the world, chaos will rule and innocent people will continue to die.
"We need to support democratic societies and stop terrorism at all costs."
A who's who of Hollywood heavyweights joined Kidman on the ad.
The actors listed included: Michael Douglas, Dennis Hopper, Sylvester Stallone, Bruce Willis, Danny De Vito, Don Johnson, James Woods, Kelly Preston, Patricia Heaton and William Hurt.
Directors Ridley Scott, Tony Scott, Michael Mann, Dick Donner and Sam Raimi also signed their names.
Other Hollywood powerplayers supporting the ad included Sumner Redstone, the chairman and majority owner of Paramount Pictures, and billionaire mogul, Haim Saban.
Some familiar names there, along with a few new ones, I think.
Thanks,
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
no subject
Date: 2006-08-18 02:39 am (UTC)And I thought it wasn't possible to love that man more. ♥
no subject
Date: 2006-08-18 02:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-18 04:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-18 02:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-18 05:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-18 02:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-18 03:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-18 04:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-18 04:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-18 04:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-18 06:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-20 06:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-18 04:47 am (UTC)*resumes drooling*
no subject
Date: 2006-08-18 05:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-18 06:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-18 06:32 am (UTC)And, err, Nicole. (No h) Shows how much I go to movies these days @_@;
no subject
Date: 2006-08-18 01:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-18 02:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-18 02:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-18 03:36 pm (UTC)Big surprise to me was Danny Devito.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-18 06:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-19 02:28 pm (UTC)Yeah, okay, terrorism bad.
What about the war? Are they implying that Bush's offense is the right way to go? Or would the last sentence more rightly be "...but of course, the so-called 'War on Terror' is just making things worse"?