Supreme Court and John Roberts
Sep. 22nd, 2005 02:21 pm![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
stormkitten.livejournal.com posting in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
therightfangirlJohn Roberts confirmed by Judiciary Committee 13-5
Sadly, the article is all hung up on abortion rights and whether Roberts will be an activist judge. I think way too many are disappointed that he apparently won't be (if the hearings are any judge).
*sigh* Whatever happened to Congress making the laws and the judges deciding whether it's constitutional or not?
Sadly, the article is all hung up on abortion rights and whether Roberts will be an activist judge. I think way too many are disappointed that he apparently won't be (if the hearings are any judge).
*sigh* Whatever happened to Congress making the laws and the judges deciding whether it's constitutional or not?
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2005-09-22 08:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-22 08:36 pm (UTC)Roberts will make one awesome Chief Justice. He's intelligent, well-spoken, and won't mess around with "Constitutional interpretation". YES!
no subject
Date: 2005-09-22 09:13 pm (UTC)(Come on, I can't be the only one who thinks Roberts is more than a tad bit attractive.)
no subject
Date: 2005-09-23 05:32 pm (UTC)