And so it begins...
Jun. 23rd, 2012 06:38 pmLet me preface this by saying that I'm not the biggest fan of Romney and I am a life-long dog lover. But this is an example of another MSM hits finally making it on social media, and I think it's hilarious how they have selective memories when it comes to Obama.
I saw someone on my flist post this:
"Please share this. Thank you!
Originally posted by ... [name withheld, but there were a few "Originally posted by"'s there]
(Probably doesn't matter but this flister is from the UK)
Okay - first of all, I first heard about this a few months ago *at least*. It's only making the rounds on LJ now?? I guess someone's really feeling threatened by the possibility that Romney might actually defeat Obama....
I felt compelled to comment and inform her that Obama used to *eat* dog. Isn't that abuse of sorts? I'm sure they'd rebut with "Oh but that was years ago and he never said he liked it! Plus he has Bo now!" Well, this Romney thing was years ago, too. Again I'm not the biggest Romney fan and I don't condone what he did, but honestly, the one-sided drama queens just make me shake my head. I'd comment to her but she's a decent person otherwise (has never posted about politics before with the exception of her opposition to SOPA/PIPA/ACTA) and I don't feel like getting into an argument.
I saw someone on my flist post this:
"Please share this. Thank you!
Originally posted by ... [name withheld, but there were a few "Originally posted by"'s there]
Spreading Romney has gotten off of the front page of Google. Whatever your feelings on Dan Savage, the reason behind him starting this site is a just one - Mitt Romney shared this story about strapping his dog to the roof of his car as a way to "connect with the common man."
I don't want an animal abuser in the White House, how about you? Anyone who is that cavalier about abusing animals won't give a crap about abusing humans, either.
Please share this far and wide. Thank you for your support.
This sickens me. I thought I couldn't be more sickened by Mitt Romney. Please click the long link and read the story on Wikipedia about the Romney family vacation of June 1983. It will open your eyes even more to the kind of man Romney is."
I don't want an animal abuser in the White House, how about you? Anyone who is that cavalier about abusing animals won't give a crap about abusing humans, either.
Please share this far and wide. Thank you for your support.
This sickens me. I thought I couldn't be more sickened by Mitt Romney. Please click the long link and read the story on Wikipedia about the Romney family vacation of June 1983. It will open your eyes even more to the kind of man Romney is."
(Probably doesn't matter but this flister is from the UK)
Okay - first of all, I first heard about this a few months ago *at least*. It's only making the rounds on LJ now?? I guess someone's really feeling threatened by the possibility that Romney might actually defeat Obama....
I felt compelled to comment and inform her that Obama used to *eat* dog. Isn't that abuse of sorts? I'm sure they'd rebut with "Oh but that was years ago and he never said he liked it! Plus he has Bo now!" Well, this Romney thing was years ago, too. Again I'm not the biggest Romney fan and I don't condone what he did, but honestly, the one-sided drama queens just make me shake my head. I'd comment to her but she's a decent person otherwise (has never posted about politics before with the exception of her opposition to SOPA/PIPA/ACTA) and I don't feel like getting into an argument.
no subject
Date: 2012-06-23 11:40 pm (UTC)That being said, there was probably once upon a time when it was perfectly reasonable to put your dog on the roof when you have five kids crammed into a vehicle. Now you have a world full of freetard yuppies who pay the big bucks to send their dog-children to doggie daycare everyday, and they probably puked a little bit in their mouths after hearing about the Stinky Seamus Scandal. :-P
no subject
Date: 2012-06-24 12:06 am (UTC)Haha, good point. I've watched the show "Dogs in the City" and it's unbelievable how some of these dogs are treated like children, pampered to the extent that they don't even get to be dogs. And they wonder why their dogs don't act ... well, the way they're expected to act. "Oh, my poor little baby... I'm so afraid to put her down on the sidewalk and make her walk because it might damage her delicate, petite frame!" *eyeroll* I have a coonhound/beagle puppy myself. She acts like a dog and likes being a dog. She'd probably laugh at the yuppies if she could, lol...
no subject
Date: 2012-06-24 02:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-06-24 02:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-06-24 11:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-06-24 05:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-06-24 04:34 am (UTC)YIS,
WRI
no subject
Date: 2012-06-24 05:27 pm (UTC)They truly are from another dimension.
ETA: So I did leave a comment about Obama eating dog and I did get a reply just like that ("there's a difference between eating an animal and being cruel to it"). The lengths these people will go to defend the King are just truly amazing.
no subject
Date: 2012-06-25 03:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-06-25 04:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-06-24 02:23 pm (UTC)I don't want a Socialist in the White House. Isn't that a wee bit more important?
(Probably doesn't matter but this flister is from the UK)
It matters in the sense that the rest of the world sees Obama as this great savior - and his thinking matches with much of the world's Socialists & Communists in power. The world wants this clown elected.
the one-sided drama queens just make me shake my head
Tell me about it. Got a lot of them on my flist and I don't get their blind devotion to the MSM.
no subject
Date: 2012-06-24 05:36 pm (UTC)I guess in another way it matters too because that's just how someone from another country would view this. They'd only care about smaller issues like this and not about what's really at stake. And yeah, there's the whole "Messiah" thing with them. I'd better brace myself if he (hopefully) loses. Bet I'll have lots of people screeching that they want everyone who voted against him off their flist. *shrugs* My flist will be a lot smaller but I'll be better off for it.
*sigh* Yep... I'll find one person doing one of those leftist memes and asking people to spread it around, think it's just one person who I know is reliably leftist and then I go to the next page and see it showing up on dozens more. I've only seen this particular one on that girl's LJ, wonder how long before I'll see it explode all over my flist...
no subject
Date: 2012-06-24 09:16 pm (UTC)Bet I'll have lots of people screeching that they want everyone who voted against him off their flist.
You and me both. If I have to deal with another 2008 eons-long celebrations on my flist, I might defriend all of them for a change.
no subject
Date: 2012-06-24 09:45 pm (UTC)I did end up commenting on that meme and got a reply not from the friend who posted it, but from someone she'd gotten it from (who isn't even on her flist... hmmm...). She said that eating an animal is not as bad as abusing it. Didn't feel like arguing so I gave the standard "agree to disagree" and said it's not the most important issue to me in this election. Wonder what she'll say.
Gah, I felt like it took more than a year to slog through a day's worth of my flist. Had friends overseas posting "Congrats, World!!" And a very liberal friend (though we never discussed politics) picked a fight with me. I'd written a sorta rant about the election results that I stuck behind a cut with a warning. Didn't stop her from reading it and arguing with me about something I didn't even talk about in my post. I defriended her - she was more trouble than she was worth.
no subject
Date: 2012-06-26 10:46 pm (UTC)She said that eating an animal is not as bad as abusing it.
Clearly she isn't a member of PETA, whose hard-core members see it as the same thing. Logic!fail on her part, but if she's willing to argue with you over that, then she isn't worth talking to, period.
no subject
Date: 2012-06-27 12:09 am (UTC)I was about to say "PETA might disagree with you" to her. Out of curiosity I looked at her profile page and she said she's liberal on everything except animal rights and gun control. So I guess the issue here is defending the Barack love - not so much concern for the animals.
no subject
Date: 2012-06-27 01:52 am (UTC)LOL I'm confused...so she's conservative on gun control, as in she doesn't want any more regulation in that department? Oy.
Seems she's all about the Barack, which is sad. Just another useless idiot.
no subject
Date: 2012-06-28 01:44 am (UTC)Sad is right. I've got a few old friends who have always been good, sensible people. Yet they "like" Barack or a link on Barack's page on Facebook. It's sad when people who you thought knew better are just part of the sheeple.