Sarah Palin: The Undefeated (2011)
Mar. 11th, 2012 05:02 pm![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Sarah Palin: The Undefeated (2011)
Written and directed by Stephen Bannon
With appearances by Andrew Breitbart, Tammy Bruce, Mark Levin, Tom Irwin, and more
Narrated by Sarah Palin (using audio from her book Going Rogue)

I like political movies (Primary Colors, Man of the Year, and Mr. Smith Goes to Washington being a few of my favorites). I also enjoy documentaries. So when I noticed that Netflix was now streaming Sarah Palin: The Undefeated, I figured I'd give it a chance. I'm not a big fan of Sarah Palin. Looking at it from the outside, her political career was admirable, especially considering she's raisedseven five children during the process. But there's just something about her demeanor that rubs me the wrong way. I put that aside and watched the movie with an open mind.
I have to be honest - The Undefeated is one-sided. As The Road We've Traveled is a butt-kissing tribute to Obama (and even the director admits as much), so The Undefeated is to Sarah Palin. There's various interviews with people from her career as both the mayor of Wasilla and the governor of Alaska, as well as supporters from her vice-presidential run (like Mark Levin and the late Andrew Breitbart). This is all intercut with archive news footage, newspaper clippings, and strange stock footage (for example, while talking about personal attacks made against her staff by her critics, there's stock footage of some ancient medieval battle with people dying on the field played against Palin's own voice -- eerie).
What's interesting is what ISN'T in the movie - not one mention of the "Bridge to Nowhere" or the investigation against her for the dismissal of Alaska's Public Safety Commissioner Walt Monegan, an investigation that determined Palin abused her power as governor and violated Alaska ethics legislation that she herself signed into law. No talk of her daughter's pregnancy while she touted abstinence education on the campaign trail, which many felt was a serious conflict. Why? It turns out that Palin approached her staff to contact Bannon (as she was familiar with his work) to produce a film putting her in a positive light and explaining her reasons for leaving office while touting her accomplishments for the purpose of laying a fondation for a future presidential run. In short, The Undefeated is a propaganda film.
This movie is basically for rabid Palin fans. For others, this might be more fluff than anything else.
x-posted from
mividaloca99
Written and directed by Stephen Bannon
With appearances by Andrew Breitbart, Tammy Bruce, Mark Levin, Tom Irwin, and more
Narrated by Sarah Palin (using audio from her book Going Rogue)

I like political movies (Primary Colors, Man of the Year, and Mr. Smith Goes to Washington being a few of my favorites). I also enjoy documentaries. So when I noticed that Netflix was now streaming Sarah Palin: The Undefeated, I figured I'd give it a chance. I'm not a big fan of Sarah Palin. Looking at it from the outside, her political career was admirable, especially considering she's raised
I have to be honest - The Undefeated is one-sided. As The Road We've Traveled is a butt-kissing tribute to Obama (and even the director admits as much), so The Undefeated is to Sarah Palin. There's various interviews with people from her career as both the mayor of Wasilla and the governor of Alaska, as well as supporters from her vice-presidential run (like Mark Levin and the late Andrew Breitbart). This is all intercut with archive news footage, newspaper clippings, and strange stock footage (for example, while talking about personal attacks made against her staff by her critics, there's stock footage of some ancient medieval battle with people dying on the field played against Palin's own voice -- eerie).
What's interesting is what ISN'T in the movie - not one mention of the "Bridge to Nowhere" or the investigation against her for the dismissal of Alaska's Public Safety Commissioner Walt Monegan, an investigation that determined Palin abused her power as governor and violated Alaska ethics legislation that she herself signed into law. No talk of her daughter's pregnancy while she touted abstinence education on the campaign trail, which many felt was a serious conflict. Why? It turns out that Palin approached her staff to contact Bannon (as she was familiar with his work) to produce a film putting her in a positive light and explaining her reasons for leaving office while touting her accomplishments for the purpose of laying a fondation for a future presidential run. In short, The Undefeated is a propaganda film.
This movie is basically for rabid Palin fans. For others, this might be more fluff than anything else.
x-posted from
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
no subject
Date: 2012-03-11 09:46 pm (UTC)What's interesting is what ISN'T in the movie - not one mention of the "Bridge to Nowhere" or the investigation against her for the dismissal of Alaska's Public Safety Commissioner Walt Monegan, an investigation that determined Palin abused her power as governor and violated Alaska ethics legislation that she herself signed into law.
As far as I know, Sarah Palin was cleared of all the charges brought against her. If that is not so, please give me that evidence.
No talk of her daughter's pregnancy while she touted abstinence education on the campaign trail, which many felt was a serious conflict.
My understanding is that this is a movie about her political career? If so, I'm not sure why her daughter's pregnancy/personal life would be talked about much.
Also, 1) what do you mean by "touted abstinence", and 2) what conflict would that be?
no subject
Date: 2012-03-11 10:13 pm (UTC)The film discussed the stresses of the personal attacks, including the insane conspiracy theory that her son Trig isn't even her son. Bristol's pregnancy was part of the news during the campaign, too.
Palin talked about abstinence education on the campaign trail. There's also this from the L.A. Times, 9/6/08:
In a widely quoted 2006 survey she answered during her gubernatorial campaign, Palin said she supported abstinence-until-marriage programs. But weeks later, she proclaimed herself "pro-contraception" and said condoms ought to be discussed in schools alongside abstinence.
"I'm pro-contraception, and I think kids who may not hear about it at home should hear about it in other avenues," she said during a debate in Juneau.
When pressed about it during press interviews, Palin acknowledged her support of abstinence education.
What conflict? It's no secret people saw it as hypocritical for a woman who'd backed abstinence-only sex education to have unsuccessfully executed that policy in her own home. I'm not saying I'm agreeing with that observation as kids aren't around their parents 24/7 but you asked about the conflict, and there's the answer.
no subject
Date: 2012-03-11 10:50 pm (UTC)My parents taught us abstinence at home: I've practiced it all my life; my sister had a baby while unmarried at 21. That wasn't my parents' fault. She was responsible for her own actions.
(Also, Palin has five children, not seven.)
no subject
Date: 2012-03-12 01:38 am (UTC)I took my daughter to planned parenthood when she was 15. Not because she was having sex, but I was of the semi-liberal mindset that if she was going to have sex she was going to. This way I would be a smart mom, give her all the information and make sure she was at least practicing safe sex. She got pregnant at 17. No, it wasn't planned .How about that failure? No one wants to speak to that side of it.
no subject
Date: 2012-03-12 01:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-12 01:38 pm (UTC)It's a lie, but an effective one. It's done deliberately, in order to marginalize and ridicule the standard as well as anyone who holds it, in an effort to get rid of the standard entirely.
What we must do is not get defensive about how people are sometimes weak or how kids often don't listen, but rather point to the standard itself.
no subject
Date: 2012-03-12 12:40 pm (UTC)Branchflower link doens't work, but from the little I saw, apparently there was controversy over that finding as well. I'd have to sit there and look at the entire case, which I obviously can't do at the moment.
Still not clear on your comments re: her stance on abstinence, but I'l let it go since I can't use my computer much at the moment.
My main point is that there's no inherent conflict between a view that says abstinence is the best option for teenagers (because it is) and your daughter getting pregnant. Why people keep bringing this up is beyond me.
no subject
Date: 2012-03-11 10:28 pm (UTC)I'll skip then, as I skip everything that is put out like that.
no subject
Date: 2012-03-12 01:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-12 05:23 am (UTC)Mod Post: Warning
Date: 2012-03-12 11:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-13 03:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-13 04:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-13 11:59 am (UTC)As of yet it is a rare occurance that members use their icons to insult others, so there is no need to address it to everyone in the community. If it becomes an issue then I will most certainly call attention to it being a problem.
no subject
Date: 2012-03-13 05:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-12 02:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-12 03:38 pm (UTC)The saddest thing is that there are so many lies (and such complex ones, as with the legal cases) that it's nearly impossible to sort them out, at least quickly/easily.
The story has been set in stone. It's nearly impossible to change in the public perception now. People really do believe most of these lies. Even some conservatives and Christians believe them. Nothing will change their minds now.
Most of all, I'm amazed there are people in the world called Jedediah. And girl?! Wow.
no subject
Date: 2012-03-13 01:49 pm (UTC)So I learned something new!
(2 Kings 22:1, 2 Sam. 12:25)