O'Reilly Digs Up Truth About Sandra Fluke

[dreadfulpenny00.livejournal.com]

On his show tonight, Bill O'Reilly busted the doors wide open as to what's REALLY going on with Sandra Fluke. How is a Georgetown law student able to go all over the place to do interviews and who is scheduling them? Turns out it's someone with connections to the White House!

Mediate tells the full story (with video): http://www.mediaite.com/tv/bill-oreilly-asks-who-is-running-sandra-fluke-it-all-goes-back-to-white-house/

It turns out SKDKnickerbocker, a PR agency, is representing Fluke (with most of her interview requests going through someone named "Mike"). Who happens to be managing editor? None other than Anita "Mao Tse" Dunn, Barack Obama's former communications director. Dunn is also currently a contributor for NBC News/MSNBC/CNBC. This is the same woman who claimed that Fox News was an arm of the Republican Party. As if MSNBC isn't an arm of the Democratic Party?

So now we know what's really going on here - former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi led the charge for a mock hearing, invited the press to cover it, and then hired professional activist Sandra Fluke to testify. I doubt their intent was to sink Limbaugh or anyone else, but it was definitely an opportunity to drudge up press for the Obama administration any way they could get it. Now Dunn's taken Fluke under her wing.

I'm getting so disgusted with this administration and their misuse and abuse of the media and free speech. I feel what Limbaugh said was wrong, but to use it to attempt to sink him while Fluke herself is a fraud is inexcusable. This is another reason why the Obama administration needs to be out of the White House!

Comments

[lazypadawan.livejournal.com]

More fakery. What a surprise.

[thekindone.livejournal.com]

Limbaugh made her a celebrity. Celebrities have representation. Oh noez. When's the last time you complained about Pajamas Media supporting James O'Keefe?

You also make it sound like she sprang from nowhere, when even a cursory Wikipedia search shows she's been an activist for years.


...and free speech.

In what ways? Is Fluke not allowed to speak freely? Or do you mean someone else?

[dreadfulpenny00.livejournal.com]

Yeah, you won't last long here.

[dreadfulpenny00.livejournal.com]

I never said it was if you've actually read any of my comments.

[dreadfulpenny00.livejournal.com]

Limbaugh didn't make her a celebrity. She stopped being a private figure the minute she appeared on national television for this "mock hearing". And Pajamas Media doesn't represent James O'Keefe. Pajamas Media isn't a PR firm.

When I mentioned misuse and abuse of free speech, I was talking about the Obama administration. Read the whole sentence.

[pat-t.livejournal.com]

Administrators, has the group been taken over by liberals? Are we no longer the right fangirl list? Is this no longer a safe place to express our views? I have to put up with liberal nonsense everywhere else. I thought this was supposed to be a safe place for us to discuss our views.

[shellebelle84.livejournal.com]

What business is it of ours what goes on in other communities?

If conservatives are trolling your liberal-only space, take it up with your mod and have them banned. It's not an invitation for people to come be rude and snarky here. This community does not promote or encourage members to go troll other communities. Some individuals may do so anyway, we can't control people, but as I said. If it is a problem in another community, take it up with the mod there to resolve it.

[ford-prefect42.livejournal.com]

yes. You are a troll. Perhaps you could provide a few examples of agreement?

Look, when you join a poltical comm and post nothing but sheer hate, you're going to have to get used to the fact that you're a troll. Nothing that you have posted, at any point here, gives me any reason to believe that you share even a single position with any poster here.

Here's part of the thing that you are missing. This isn't T_P. A liberal hate-group directed against conservatives. Here, I can call you whatever I choose, and, so long as you live up to it, which you generally have, no one will complain. This isn't "supposedly-neutral-conservative-bashing" like you're used to, it's "the right fangirl". This is supposed to be the place where conservatives can talk free of the snarky bullshit you constantly post. A safe place to be US. The net is full of echo chambers for your uneducated vitriolic snark.

Every conservative here has been banned from many of liberal sites for being *far* more respectful in our disagreements than you have here. You are not going to get to be the "victim" here. You have earned the contempt you have been offered.

[ford-prefect42.livejournal.com]

Not bad, keep up with those, and knock off the snarky BS that makes up the vast majority of your posts, and you'll come up to being not banworthy.

And I am not in violation of the rules of this comm. Perhaps you should re-read them. By bringing snarky hate-filled vitriolic BS here, you are. Apparently, the mods have chosen to give you another chance. I hope you live up to it, because it's always nice when differences can be put aside. But in your case, I sincerely doubt that it'll happen.

I doubt this because I have a hundred replies from you to simple statements of position without rancor or hostility where you treated me with hatred, hostility, and rudeness. And that was in a community that was supposedly neutral. I don't have to put up with that here. I sincerely *do* hope that you are capable of better, because I dislike echo chambers, even when they echo my own thoughts, because they allow no room for growth. I hope that you can eventually put aside your anger, hatred, and bigotry and come to understand that A) we're all people, and that B) the conservative position, even the christian position is worthy of respect. I hope that that happens.

Best of luck though, sincerely. And remember that this *isn't* neutral ground.

[ford-prefect42.livejournal.com]

The part where you are lying.

"Because there are no conservatives in liberal communities. Nope, never happens. "

"Leftist commie bastards are not allowed to speak freely. Only true real American patriots can. "

"The lord is testing me. "

"What if you agree with something here and are a nasty liberal? Am I not allowed to even agree? "

"Life is annoying. "

"HIVEMINDS "

"So next with your cute little accusations?"

"I see right through you, sweetheart. Nice try, though. "


What the fuck do you call these? You can try to pretend they didn't happen, but you have more trolling posts to this comm than any other type.

Yes, respect is earned. You haven't. You have, to my knowledge, never once posted, to any comm, anything of any value whatever. But again, I sincerely hope that you do better. I personally welcome disagreement, even debate, in other comms, but in general, not here. If you want to debate, snark, or spew vitriol, go back to conservatism or t_P. It isn't welcome here. Reread the rules of the comm. It isn't about "respect" in this context, it's about what the comm *is*, I'll grant that maybe a third of your posts are "fangirl" posts, and those are well and truly welcome, and the occasional "I disagree with this position because of X" post would be welcome. What isn't welcome is the metric fuckton of snarky hatred-filled bile you spew out of every orifice at every turn. If we wanted to be exposed to that, we'd post at t_p.

[kharmii.livejournal.com]

-So you still have issues with something I said in another community, yet things on the internet supposedly don't bother you? I don't remember the context of the said conversation exactly, but given your track record in other comms, I don't believe it's that unreasonable. You are a crazy, hate-filled person, and I don't believe for a second that you are here to be friends with conservatives.

[kharmii.livejournal.com]

Sorry about the late reply. Some of us have to go to work. If I sat on my princess ass all day arguing with people with opposing views on political sites, I probably wouldn't be able to afford this high-speed internet for long.

Anyway, if I caught someone repeatedly lying, then it wouldn't be unreasonable to call that person a compulsive liar. If I caught someone screwing pigs, then it's not unreasonable to throw the word 'pigfucker' out there. Those are observations, not insults, if they are speaking truth. If you act like a crazy beeotch and someone calls you on it, then you should have the strength of character to, like, make an effort to be a little less wacky.

As for your claim to want to make friends with conservatives, if someone like ford_prefect sees evidence of you acting badly in several political comms at the same time as you are 'making friends' in a conservative-oriented comm, then you are full of crap.

[kharmii.livejournal.com]

ZOOM! That sure went over your head! I haven't denied anything. You keep clinging to my statement as if it will somehow absolve you of your past internet crazy. -As if the prefect will say, "Oh, well kharmii said that about you? THAT TOTALLY MAKES IT OKAY FOR YOU TO HAVE BEEN AN ASSHOLE TO CONSERVATIVES ON A BILLIONTY OTHER SITES!!"

[ford-prefect42.livejournal.com]

Except that is exactly what you did. We all saw it. Denying that that whicis clearly archived and witnessed by hundreds happened does nothing for your credibility.

[ford-prefect42.livejournal.com]

You'd have more credibility if you stopped lying.

Yes, I will grant that *one* of those was a "retort", however witless it may have been. The rest were a combination of you jumping into threads with snarky hate-filled vitriol, and you responding to top posts with same.

But again, I really hope that you can improve. It'd be a fine start if you took responsibility for your past trollish actions, but I know that's asking too much. Again, just knock them off, quit lying, quit spewing hate, and grow the fuck up.

I am not saying that you're a jerk because of any *one* thing you've done, I am saying that you're a jerk because of a serious lack of redeeming actions. start posting value, and you may eventually earn respect, keep as you have been and continue earning contempt.

[kharmii.livejournal.com]

YOU HAVE BEEN throwing punches for no reason! Only one of the snarky quotes he listed was directed at me. The rest were to the comm as a whole.

Why do you keep on with the distractions, making it about me? Oh wait...because that's what liberals do. I'm sure ford_prefect42 doesn't give two damns about me because we've never encountered one another in other comms. He seems to have LOTS of experience dealing with you, and so have I. -And so have a lot of people. You'de be better off buying your twentieth name-change token and hoping that people don't figure out it's you (although it hasn't been difficult in the past).

[kharmii.livejournal.com]

I don't have any good reason to be nice to you either....so go fuck yourself.

[ford-prefect42.livejournal.com]

No, I think that you are a hateful jerk because youdid exactly come here and start eandomly insulting us and what we believe. As I have documentwd repeatedly.

If you don't want to be called a liar, stop lying. If you don't want to ne called a troll, stop trolling. If you don't wantbto be called hateful stop spewing hate at those that have done nothing to you. As for the single instance of someone saying comparing you to a murderer, i'll grant that you were within your rights to retort. but that is one ou of all the quotes I listed. Youbwill be judged by your actions, and so far are very very wanting.

[dreadfulpenny00.livejournal.com]

Hold up! You admitted to name-calling four minutes after you made this comment! WTF‽

http://therightfangirl.livejournal.com/1481983.html?thread=16371967#t16371967 - your own words

Are you talking about calling kharmii a "jerk" or are you talking about your incidents in other comms?

[caromiofic.livejournal.com]

+1

The comments are getting annoying.

[thekindone.livejournal.com]

Why does it automatically mean I'm a liberal if I think this issue is idiotic?

[farchivist.livejournal.com]

then hired professional activist Sandra Fluke to testify

Whoa here. She was hired? Because if so, that's bribery and false testimony. Testifying before a Congressional hearing is a legal activity, following rules and bylaws that Congress has set. You're not allowed to hire people do that.

So if she was bribed to volunteer to testify, where did you get that information from? And how much was she paid by Pelosi? And why is WorldNetDaily saying that it was it was Representative Carolyn Maloney (D-New York) who pushed for Fluke’s testimony to be given at the Pelosi hearing? (kleinonline.wnd.com/2012/03/06/is-this-why-sandra-fluke-testified-progressive-groups-behind-obamas-contraception-strategy/)

[dreadfulpenny00.livejournal.com]

If you remember, Pelosi announced beforehand that it wasn't an official Congressional hearing. Therefore, all bets are off.

[farchivist.livejournal.com]

I would still think that if payment of some sort had been made, the multitude of investigators plumbing the depths of Sandra Fluke's life would have pulled up a record of it. Slip a couple of $20s to a bank clerk, go through the trash, or whatever, and hey presto: you have a verifiable record. Until something like that actually comes up, I don't see it.

[hannahsarah.livejournal.com]

Sandra Fluke = Professional Troll

I always wondered if a person could make a living like that. I guess you can, as long as you throw any concept of morality out the door.

[hannahsarah.livejournal.com]

BTW, in all fairness, Rush Limbaugh has been a professional troll for years. He should have known better than to take the bait like that.

Edited for stupid typo.

[hannahsarah.livejournal.com]

Google "memebon" and prepare to DIE of cuteness.

You have been warned.

[kharmii.livejournal.com]

This whole debacle is making me roll my eyes. There are worse things to worry about. How bad does the economy have to get before we stop dwelling on nonsense and focus on how Obama is the worst president ever. Does the debt have to get to 20 trillion?

[kelincihutan.livejournal.com]

You mean they lied?!? O NOEZ!!! (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4wdpSFQTulo)

More seriously, though, we all knew she was a smokescreen. Though it is undeniably nice to have it official.

[dark-weezing.livejournal.com]

At least, Issa saw through it, or tried his best. Oh, well, she's very telegenic for the Left's latest martyr, and an active member. Wonderful.

I want to talk about oil prices, Iran getting a bomb and the economy. So, of course, we have to discuss about contraception. For the Left who always asserting that the Right is obsessed with sex and the contraception, uh, who keeps bringing up both topics all the time? (Sure, Santorum did, once in a while, but really.)

Thank you, State-controlled media. We all continue to fall for it, day in and out.

[pat-t.livejournal.com]

Can I just give you a great big AMEN?!

[dark-weezing.livejournal.com]

I believe the expression is "Preach it, sister."

The next time the Left does this -- and they will -- can they pick someone less obnoxious, please? I can't even watch a minute of Fluke and her superiority complex in action. I'm sure there are many nice liberals who can do the same thing without the arrogance, if that's possible. Just saying.

[jacobs-muse.livejournal.com]

+1

[jacobs-muse.livejournal.com]

Word.

[dark-weezing.livejournal.com]

Say it with me now, "We are Sluticus!"

http :// www.redstate.com/darin_h/2012/03/06/i-am-sluticus/