Rush Clears Up Show's Sponsorship
Mar. 7th, 2012 02:39 pm![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Media Matters has been bragging about getting 30 or so companies to "drop" their sponsorship of Rush Limbaugh's radio show over his comments about Sandy "It's Pronounced Fluck!" Fluke and the MSM has been wetting itself with the prospect of hushing Rush forever. I've even sent some angry grams at a couple of the so-called boycotting companies since I had been a customer. Here, Rush says, "Not so fast."
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2012/03/07/clearing_up_misinformation_on_our_sponsors
Actually, I'm not sure which is worse, withdrawing sponsorship out of intimidation or pretending to withdraw sponsorship just to score brownie points with leftists who don't care about women, but do want to shut up an effective voice for conservatism during an election year.
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2012/03/07/clearing_up_misinformation_on_our_sponsors
Actually, I'm not sure which is worse, withdrawing sponsorship out of intimidation or pretending to withdraw sponsorship just to score brownie points with leftists who don't care about women, but do want to shut up an effective voice for conservatism during an election year.
no subject
Date: 2012-03-07 10:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-07 11:00 pm (UTC)That's how capitalism works. If enough customers or potential customers express disappointment in the behavior of a sponsored individual, the sponsoring companies will act in the way to protect their profit flow. A very sound business practice.
no subject
Date: 2012-03-07 11:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-07 11:12 pm (UTC)Thanks! Wouldn't that be awesome!
no subject
Date: 2012-03-07 11:19 pm (UTC)Did you even read the transcript? It's the left who are up in arms over Rush losing 30 sponsors out of 18,000. Rush is cool about it and seems to think it's no big deal.
no subject
Date: 2012-03-08 02:34 am (UTC)At any rate, I am more offended by a liberal telling Christian institutions that they have to pay for birth control and morning after pills, especially while Obama is cutting military health benefits, than I am about a stupid joke made by an entertainer. But if we are going to talk about offensive entertainers, what do you think about Louis C.K. headlining the White House Correspondents dinner? Do you know some of the things Louis C.K. has said about Sarah Palin and other conservative women?
P.S. Rush agrees with you about his sponsors. It's the free market and he has plenty more sponsors lined up to take their place.
no subject
Date: 2012-03-08 05:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-08 08:22 pm (UTC)Just wanna say I am in the same boat. I'm on birth control for bad PMS issues. Not sure if they're so severe to be classified PMDD, but they are pretty bad and being on birth control has helped them some. And I feel the same way, though I see the comment below yours mentions the pill is covered for medical reasons. That's good to know. :) I mean, I'm Catholic but if you have problems like this, what are you supposed to do - suffer? I've tried other remedies and they don't seem to help much (although St. John's Wort helps me a little, too).
no subject
Date: 2012-03-08 09:15 pm (UTC)Yeah, it would be really helpful. One of my friends sent me an article that described PMDD very well (can't remember where I saw it) and suspected that was my problem. But my doctor seemed to think it was just severe PMS. I have an appt in a few weeks - have a new doctor since I moved after getting married - I'll definitely ask about it when I go!
no subject
Date: 2012-03-08 09:37 pm (UTC)I'm glad it's helping you. It never helped me but made me feel worse! I'm so jealous, haha.
no subject
Date: 2012-03-09 12:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-08 10:11 pm (UTC)Thanks! Aw that sucks. I was on it before when I was 19 because I had very irregular periods (I'm talking more than once a month for 8 days apiece - I was dying). It helped for a while but it was pretty strong stuff and actually gave me bad headaches, nausea and mood swings. I went off it after a year and a half. I guess it depends on how strong they are.
no subject
Date: 2012-03-09 12:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-09 02:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-09 07:53 am (UTC)Here's what I don't get and what completely floors me. Here in Georgia, we have many such Catholic institutions in the state, including several Catholic-run hospitals. We also are the seat of the archdiocese; we have an Archbishop that governs the northern half of GA.
In 1999, the GA state government passed and signed into law the exact same contraception mandate that Obama has proposed. So here in the state of GA, all Catholic institutions are required to make sure birth control and morning after pills are covered in the insurance - there are no religious exceptions allowed in the state law. The Catholic Church here in GA has NEVER challenged the law and has abided by it.
So I'm confused; why does the RCC not protest the law on the GA state level, but on the federal level? I wrote the Archdiocese about it, but they have not responded yet.
no subject
Date: 2012-03-09 01:46 pm (UTC)Politics-wise, though, that doesn't *really* bother me, even though I think it's dumb, because it was mandated on the state level. States have the right to do just about whatever they want with their citizens. (This is why although I dislike Romneycare, it doesn't entirely bother me politically, because it was on the state level.) The federal government does not.
no subject
Date: 2012-03-07 11:18 pm (UTC)I hope the left blows a gasket over this. They wanted so badly to shut down Rush the way they've silenced so many others they've been able to play the victim card with. Rush apologized and they're still going after him because the #1 goal is to silence someone on the right. I've never heard an apology for the horrible things said about Bachmann and Palin. Time magazine even made excuses for why it totally wasn't childish to put that unfortunate picture of Bachmann on the cover of their magazine. Oh, and we never heard an apology from Wanda Sykes for saying that she hopes Limbaugh dies of cancer, and no apology from Obama for laughing.
no subject
Date: 2012-03-08 05:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-08 12:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-08 10:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-08 11:13 pm (UTC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedhealth/PMH0004461/
It seems they are implicating an unhealthy lifestyle as a major cause of it, with the first step of treatment being healthier lifestyle changes. It was an interesting article. I consider it to be along the lines of Chronic Fatigue and fibromyalgia.....diseases of the western world.
no subject
Date: 2012-03-08 11:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-09 12:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-09 02:14 am (UTC)And uh... wow!
no subject
Date: 2012-03-09 07:28 pm (UTC)When I meet someone who sits on welfare for a 'disability' and who seems to never sleep, spewing vitriol on the political sites 24/7, I tend to go with the 'unhealthy lifestyle' assumption for the root cause of their ailments, believing that, at the very least, anti-psycotics might be more of a benefit than birth-control pills. -Not that I'm pointing the finger at anyone in particular.
no subject
Date: 2012-03-09 09:56 pm (UTC)It is unfortunate that some people will take advantage of the system by faking ailments. It definitely happens, and it sucks for those of us who are really sick to sometimes get tarred with the same brush. I get a lot of people telling me "You look good." While it's a nice thing to hear in general, often times it comes with the unspoken, "which means you can't possibly be sick," and that bothers me. I might "look good," but there are days when I'm lucky to get out of bed before 1 PM. I have a fairly strict routine that I'm able to keep up with, but anything extra on top of that will cost me in added pain and exhaustion, which means I might not have the energy to get through my daily routine the next day.
Certainly some conditions could be attributed to unhealthy lifestyle, but I also think that over the last several generations, "new" things have become part of our lives that might also be contributing factors to some of these Western World conditions. Hormones in meat and milk, additives in food, pesticides, chemicals used to make certain products, technology etc. I don't think we really know the effects some of these things might be having on our bodies. My parents generation ate mostly the things they grew themselves and a lot less mass produced foods. They spent more time outdoors as well. I'm sure that was a much healthier way to live. As we adapt to new technologies and more conveniences, I think it's entirely possible that new illnesses will crop up for which we will find no obvious cause.
I'm not on disability, btw. I could be, and it would certainly be nice to have, but because of my illness, I actually can't work up the mental energy to start the process of applying for it. Which is kind of ironic, no? Luckily, my husband is a very good provider, and I'm able to stay home and take care of our house and kids as best I can.
Wow, my comment got long. TL;DR We're good, no worries. :D
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2012-03-09 07:56 am (UTC)Let's have some Biblical honesty here instead of hedging around with behind-the-back insinuations. You believe that
no subject
Date: 2012-03-09 07:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-08 02:01 am (UTC)http :// campaign2012.washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/beltway-confidential/carbonite-ceo-david-friend-donated-obama/415321
Oh, well. At least, Bill Maher actually criticized about the pullouts, so good for him.
no subject
Date: 2012-03-08 03:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-08 03:45 am (UTC)I'll go ahead and take my leave before my brain fails me completely. Good night, everybody!
no subject
Date: 2012-03-08 06:21 pm (UTC)...
A more serious answer would be I didn't know you were a leftist when I initially commented. That's my fault for not being aware. I was trying to find a graceful way out, and I was a little tired when I posted, last night. Let's go with that.
no subject
Date: 2012-03-09 07:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-08 04:06 am (UTC)But thanks for the heads up. Looks like I have a year to find a different option.
no subject
Date: 2012-03-08 03:40 am (UTC)That's perfect. AP also reminded that Axelrod also mocked Carrie Prejean, back when. Forgot about that.
no subject
Date: 2012-03-08 03:30 pm (UTC)Basically, the left feels justified in their slurs, degrading comments, and anti-feminist rhetoric towards conservative women because, to them, any conservative is an acceptable target. So calling Michelle Malkin an "Aunt Tomasina" stops being, in their mind, bigotry towards both women and people of color, and starts being a perfectly okay thing to call someone. Just...argh. The amount of rampant anti-feminism that is not simply tolerated, but encouraged by liberals all over the place--even the supposedly feminist ones--just infuriates me.