Oh, well then you missed the best part! She ended up in court (I don't remember why), had her kids taken from her, then was banned from visiting them at the children's house where they're staying because she and her sister threatened physical violence on the social workers caring for her children! She doesn't care about her kids. She's just lazy.
All I can say is that after the 6th kid, I am pretty sure the rest of the herd were not squeezed out, but walked on out when they were to enter the world.
Must be like throwing a hot dog down an aircraft hanger.
People like her are why I support forced sterilizations/eugenics.
Emphasis mine; you support the specific policies that (if successful) will lead to a perceived improvement of the human gene pool? I think that's a very dangerous position to take, especially if someone decides that a characteristic you possess is not an "improvement".
Unfortunately, this woman is not an isolated case. One of my former students told me that her mother had another girl (her 11th.) She wants a boy. She obviously hasn't found a "baby daddy" who produces those "Y" sperm....And still, I'm expected to pay for this kind of stupid.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-30 07:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-30 08:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-30 11:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-30 11:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-30 11:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-30 08:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-30 08:38 pm (UTC)Her "fiancé" - what a joke.
Somebody needs to be kept accountable? How about YOU!
People like this woman make me sick.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-30 08:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-30 09:02 pm (UTC)Those poor kids. It's not their fault they were born to such idiots.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-30 11:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-30 11:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-30 09:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-30 10:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-30 11:23 pm (UTC)She lives in deadbeat heaven, too. Good luck with child support, lady.
no subject
Date: 2011-12-01 12:09 am (UTC)Must be like throwing a hot dog down an aircraft hanger.
Eugenics: not just for dogs!
Date: 2011-12-01 01:05 pm (UTC)Re: Eugenics: not just for dogs!
Date: 2011-12-03 02:45 am (UTC)Emphasis mine; you support the specific policies that (if successful) will lead to a perceived improvement of the human gene pool? I think that's a very dangerous position to take, especially if someone decides that a characteristic you possess is not an "improvement".
Re: Eugenics: not just for dogs!
Date: 2011-12-04 09:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-01 07:55 pm (UTC)I feel bad for those kids. They don't deserve that mess.
no subject
Date: 2011-12-03 02:42 pm (UTC)