ext_18476 ([identity profile] fabricdragon.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] therightfangirl2009-12-11 03:18 pm

Canadian author assaulted by border patrol

I am editing this to emphasize a point that apparently i was unclear about:

The Canadian author Dr. Peter Watts was arrested on charges of assaulting a federal officer after large groups of border patrol swarmed his car. refused to tell him why, refused his requests for legal council, and kicked and beat him. His story HERE, another story and means of contributing to his legal defense HERE.

Even if he did assault one of them ... what happened next is completely unreasonable.
he was refused a lawyer because it was homeland security. he was then sent out into a snowstorm in shirt sleeves, without coat, car , or possibility of a bus....


The US border patrol, apparently thinking Canadians have anti freeze in their veins, graciously allowed him to be released in Canada the next night.... minus all his belongings, his phone, his car , his computer, his notepaper.. and his coat.
in a snowstorm
after public transit shut down
and without notifying Canadian police or anyone that maybe they should pick him up to keep him from freezing to death, hmmm?

he will have to travel BACK to the united states to deal with the federal assault charges, which could lead to him being fined, jailed, and banned from the US
i am sure that right now he finds the idea of never traveling across this border again to be such a loss.

The possibility that he did or did not assault the officer is not why i am concerned enough to re post this....
The reason i am concerned is because i have seen a track record of border and TSA agency personnel refusing lawyers to people. i have NEVER before heard of an arraigned Canadian citizen being sent into a Canadian night without the Canada police or someone being called to come get him.

[identity profile] izuko.livejournal.com 2009-12-11 08:33 pm (UTC)(link)
Or we could wait to hear what the Border Patrol has to say about it.

[identity profile] izuko.livejournal.com 2009-12-11 09:20 pm (UTC)(link)
If we can assume that that was the case.

[identity profile] elena23.livejournal.com 2009-12-11 08:41 pm (UTC)(link)
Did I miss a point where this community became the sounding board for anti-police propaganda? Did I accidently join theanarchistfangirl? Crap!

[identity profile] mosinging1986.livejournal.com 2009-12-11 08:51 pm (UTC)(link)
Ain't it? Especially when only one side of the story is given, and therefore you cannot make an informed decision as to what to think about the situation.

[identity profile] mosinging1986.livejournal.com 2009-12-11 09:07 pm (UTC)(link)
I am not sure what you mean by this comment.

What I see is a story that only gives partial information. There has to be a reason why this man was stopped, but that is not known. There must have been some conversation between them all, but that is not known. There is a lot here that isn't known, which would therefore affect what we think of the story. There's simply not enough information given.

Yet your decision has already been made that the border patrol officers are completely in the wrong.
ext_1059: (Default)

[identity profile] shezan.livejournal.com 2009-12-12 01:56 am (UTC)(link)
Even if the guy mouthed off stupidly, he should not have been treated like that. That's not what you expect from officials representing the United States, but from Third World tinpot dictatprship goons.

[identity profile] lucy-chronicles.livejournal.com 2009-12-12 09:20 am (UTC)(link)
This is par for the course for TSA.

Go back to the preacher who was detained and beaten in Arizona. That case is going to trial. Unlike the Ron Paul worker who was detained and they've reached 'conclusion' by changing rules.

Here's Lew Rockwell's latest in case you missesd it:
http://www.lewrockwell.com/akers/akers115.html

[identity profile] izuko.livejournal.com 2009-12-11 09:19 pm (UTC)(link)
You didn't get the memo?

[identity profile] whouseknecht.livejournal.com 2009-12-11 09:54 pm (UTC)(link)
See my post below.
ext_1059: (Default)

[identity profile] shezan.livejournal.com 2009-12-12 01:53 am (UTC)(link)
We do NOT want bad apples behaving like the Soviet or Iranian police. Even if the guy mouthed off, the way he was treated is outrageous. Go to [Bad username or site: ”papersky” @ livejournal.com]'s LJ for links.

[identity profile] whouseknecht.livejournal.com 2009-12-11 09:53 pm (UTC)(link)
What fascinating commentary I see about this. Something happens to a friend of a friend, such information as is available is provided, and the poster's comment is that, if this is true, such behavior by the Border Patrol (i.e., leaving someone stranded in a snowstorm) is unconscionable. The most reasonable reply is "assuming that is what happened", which is fair.

On the other hand, claiming that the post belongs on an anarchist forum?

I rather had the idea that being on the Right was about restraining government excesses, among which excesses is over-zealous an police authority (the sort of thing which leads to a police state). Appropriate use of appropriate means by appropriate authority is, to my mind, a Conservative view.

Assuming the account is generally accurate, under what Conservative doctrine would it be appropriate to deport someone without informing the receiving nation of the fact?

Even assuming the account is not accurate, what standard of behavior permits leaving a man in a blizzard with no means of contacting anyone (which is what the original poster is complaining about)?

If you don't think it's possible for Federal authorities to overstep the rules, then why are you posting here?

[identity profile] elena23.livejournal.com 2009-12-12 12:07 am (UTC)(link)
The anarchist crack was just hyperbole, due to the volume of posts lately about the big bad police officers, not intended to be serious.

Yes, of course if the allegations are true, it's inappropriate and illegal (and immoral and just plain wrong). I won't make that assumption based purely on media sources however, let alone "a friend of a friend said so."

My tongue-in-cheek attitude comes largely from the fact that I'm tired of having to come on this community and defend my fellow police officers, the overwhelming majority of whom are doing a difficult, dangerous job for not enough pay and doing it legally and well. Especially while I've put in 14-hour shifts the last two days in a row and am on day 4 of 6 work days in a row.

Can't we talk about Karl Urban's ass or something? Please? :) Because that would be so much more fun.

Re: sincerely, thank you for your service.

[identity profile] elena23.livejournal.com 2009-12-12 02:53 am (UTC)(link)
Likely my irritation showed through, simply because of some other recent posts we've had, so I apologize for that. I think that you've been more than sincere and fair, so it's definitely not you.

I police in a dangerous district. I've had to investigate the death of three of my fellow officers since 2006. It's difficult for Police Officers to maintain a balance sometimes, between the realization that any call, any traffic stop, any encounter could be life-ending and the fact that 99.9% of them are not.

I also have a very wary view of the media, because I know how often they get the details (and not just the small details, but almost the entire story) wrong on the cases that I have investigated. So my gut reaction is generally to wait and see where things shake out legally before trusting what is in print.

All that said, there's no excuse for bad behavior. The actions of the few bad police officers make it that much more difficult on the rest of them. If the actions you describe above were true and purposeful, then that's horrid and they should be fired, if not prosecuted. I think that's probably not the case (I've found, working for the government, that I generally never attribute to malice what can be explained by mind-numbing bureaucracy or just plain stupidity is generally accurate), but that the truth is somewhere in the middle.

Thanks for being understanding. And thanks for the rosaries! As a Catholic Cop, I definitely think that's cool.
Edited 2009-12-12 02:54 (UTC)
ext_1059: (Default)

[identity profile] shezan.livejournal.com 2009-12-12 02:00 am (UTC)(link)
THIS. Since when do we think the government is always right?

[identity profile] regalpewter.livejournal.com 2009-12-12 04:33 am (UTC)(link)
The government hasn't been right for a while..../sarcasim off

I really want to know more about this case, particularly after the Canadians recently booted one of our author/reporters without explaination.(her name escapes me ATM, but she's known to write from the left side of things)

I've crossed numerious times where he did and they had to flag him specifically down. Normally, one does not stop when leaving the US there. The factor of a rental car may be a part of it, but I am curious as to what may have preciptated it by either party.
As former law enforcement myself, this is one that makes my suspicions rise and I feel it deserves higher examination. I really want to know what the prosecution has to say or wheither they will move to dismiss.

Just my 0.02.
YIS,
WRI

[identity profile] lucy-chronicles.livejournal.com 2009-12-12 09:21 am (UTC)(link)
by gods - some sense!

i have hope for this community.

[identity profile] anastasis.livejournal.com 2009-12-11 11:29 pm (UTC)(link)
Having dealt with border guards before I'm inclined to believe this.

They didn't assault me or throw me out in a storm, but they did question my then-boyfriend extensively about whether I was a mail order bride, in front of me, without allowing me to speak for myself and telling me to be quiet when I tried (as a non-American, of course, I wasn't worthy of speaking to them.)

I think standing outside in the cold all day checking cars makes them hate humanity.

[identity profile] nmissi.livejournal.com 2009-12-12 02:29 am (UTC)(link)
Eh. Being conservative doesn't automatically make one think the police are always the good guys. In my experience, cops come in one of two varieties- the hero and the thug. Alas, sometimes they both reside in the same individual, depending upon the situation.

No matter how badly he behaved, this doesn't look well. Not good PR, you know? They clearly didn't find him dangerous enough to keep him, so their total disregard of his safety seems the bigger issue right now.

[identity profile] i-am-pellucid.livejournal.com 2009-12-12 03:47 am (UTC)(link)
Is this news being reported on anything more reliable than a blog that I could look at?

[identity profile] i-am-pellucid.livejournal.com 2009-12-14 02:35 am (UTC)(link)
Thank you. xD

I'm not a huge anime fan, but Trigun is so philosophical, atmospheric and entertaining that I cannot resist.

[identity profile] lazypadawan.livejournal.com 2009-12-12 05:33 am (UTC)(link)
I saw this on [livejournal.com profile] johncwright's LJ as well.

I'll withhold judgment on the case until I see all of the facts. It doesn't seem likely a science fiction writer would pick a fight with Border Patrol, but there's always two sides to a story. If it turns out this man was mistreated by a bunch of cowboys, then Border Patrol needs to do something about them and Watts ought to sue for a crapload of money.

I work with Border Patrol (by San Diego) all of the time. They're pretty good guys and they're very professional. If Watts is telling the truth, it's not representative of the BP guys I know.