Dec. 14th, 2009

[identity profile] lucy-chronicles.livejournal.com
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/13/opinion/13sun2.html?_r=2&scp=2&sq=Twitter&st=cse

And we 'know' it must be even worse given the source liberal publication = NY Times. Someone has filed a suit. Whoppee... I hold out about as much hope for that changing anything as the Fed actually being abolished, our civil liberties restored or pulling out of any of the existing wars around the globe w/o bankrupting our country first.

So what's the next source of monitoring to occur? Orwell's 1984 novel ala' through the television?

Thanks to the big brother community for the original 'alert'.

[identity profile] lazypadawan.livejournal.com
20 cash-strapped states have already cut funding for mammograms after that "study" recommending that women don't get mammograms until the age of 50:

http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com/2009/12/change-20-states-cut-mammograms-after-government-report-released/

The issue isn't whether there should be state funding for poor women to get mammograms (charity can always step in and help). The issue is this is a preview of what will happen if the government completely takes over health care. The day costs go up and there isn't enough revenue, especially if there's an economic downturn, you won't get the services you want or need.

Profile

therightfangirl: (Default)
The Right Fangirl

June 2020

S M T W T F S
 123456
789 10 111213
141516 17181920
21222324252627
282930    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 27th, 2025 03:38 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios