Piggybacking Griswold v. Connecticut, Lawrence V. Texas manipulated "right to privacy"

[dirae.livejournal.com]

How staged sex crime fooled Supreme Court: Landmark sodomy case faked from start, shrouded in murder mystery, says judge

Judge Janice Law , in her new book, Sex Appealed: Was the U.S. Supreme Court Fooled?, found that “the Supreme Court, possibly for the first time in history, ruled on a case with virtually no factual underpinnings.”

The case, of course, was Lawrence v. Texas. Simple story: A man makes a call to the police reporting a man firing a gun in an apartment building. The police come and are directed to John Lawrence's apartment by the same man who placed the call. He insists that a man with a gun was threatening neighbors. They entered the apartment and found a man talking on the telephone. He motioned the officers to a bedroom in the rear. The officers ID’ed themselves as of sheriff's deputies once again. “…[The] officers, expecting to see an armed man, perhaps holding a hostage or in a prone position ready to fire at them, instead, found was Lawrence having anal sex with his partner.” They were asked to stop, but they continued… and continued. After repeated warnings, Lawrence and his partner continued to have sex in front of the officers until physically moved apart.

Law insists that “Lawrence” was planned from the start and “that police, in effect, were entrapped into witnessing a crime because the homosexual activists needed a test case.”

The book begs the question: How could there be an issue of privacy in a case in which police were invited, encouraged, begged to enter an apartment and directed to the bedroom where the unlawful sexual activity was taking place?

Something to think about, hmm?