Two WSJ op-eds for you
Jan. 13th, 2011 01:12 pm![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
dark-weezing.livejournal.com posting in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
therightfangirlRather than devote separate entries, I'll just combine two Wall Street Journal entries into one.
1. Daniel Henninger sums up deftly what motivated the Left in their Tuscon shootings rhetoric: political calculation and personal belief. We've heard it elsewhere, but it's essential to have Henninger's take.
Link: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703791904576076373704758778.html
2. Karl Rove waxes about the selection of Bill Daley as Robert Gibbs' replacement, and how his centrism may influence the Obama presidency in the future. We'll see, won't we?
Link: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704803604576077813329940804.html
As always, you make the call.
1. Daniel Henninger sums up deftly what motivated the Left in their Tuscon shootings rhetoric: political calculation and personal belief. We've heard it elsewhere, but it's essential to have Henninger's take.
Link: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703791904576076373704758778.html
2. Karl Rove waxes about the selection of Bill Daley as Robert Gibbs' replacement, and how his centrism may influence the Obama presidency in the future. We'll see, won't we?
Link: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704803604576077813329940804.html
As always, you make the call.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}